UART Implementation Methods Comparison
1. UART Alone (Polling Mode)
// Basic UART transmission
HAL_UART_Transmit(&huart2, data, size, HAL_MAX_DELAY);
HAL_UART_Receive(&huart2, data, size, HAL_MAX_DELAY);
Characteristics:
- CPU actively waits for transmission/reception
- Blocks until operation completes
- Simplest to implement
- Best for small data transfers
- High CPU usage
2. UART + Interrupts
// Interrupt-based transmission
HAL_UART_Transmit_IT(&huart2, data, size);
HAL_UART_Receive_IT(&huart2, data, size);
// Callback when complete
void HAL_UART_TxCpltCallback(UART_HandleTypeDef *huart)
{
uart_tx_complete = 1;
}
Characteristics:
- CPU can do other tasks while waiting
- Uses interrupt handler
- Moderate CPU usage
- Good for medium-sized transfers
- Requires callback handling
3. UART + DMA
// DMA-based transmission
HAL_UART_Transmit_DMA(&huart2, data, size);
HAL_UART_Receive_DMA(&huart2, data, size);
// DMA completion callback
void HAL_UART_RxCpltCallback(UART_HandleTypeDef *huart)
{
// Process received data
HAL_UART_Receive_DMA(&huart2, data, size); // Restart reception
}
- Direct memory access without CPU
- Lowest CPU usage
- Best for large data transfers
- Most complex to setup
- Requires DMA configuration
- Can handle continuous data streams
Performance Comparison
Choose based on:
1. Data transfer size
2. CPU availability needs
3. Code complexity tolerance
4. Response time requirements